The strategy
nobody talks about
Subtraction is the most underrated strategic tool in business. The organisations gaining ground fastest right now are doing less — deliberately, structurally, and without apology.
Every strategy conversation eventually arrives at the same destination: what should we add? A new product line, a new market, a new capability, a new team. The language of strategy is the language of growth, expansion, and accumulation. More features, more geographies, more revenue streams.
What that conversation rarely includes is its necessary counterpart: what should we stop? Subtraction is the most underrated strategic tool in business. Not consolidation, which implies retreat. Not austerity, which implies constraint. Subtraction: the deliberate, principled removal of things that are consuming resource without producing proportionate return.
The cost of carrying dead weight
Every organisation of more than a few years accumulates what might be called strategic debt: products, services, processes, customer segments, and initiatives that made sense when they were introduced but that now exist primarily because no one has taken the formal decision to stop them.
This debt is rarely visible on a balance sheet. It appears instead in the culture: in meetings that exist to manage complexity that should not exist; in teams spending time on products that serve customers who are not strategically valuable; in senior leaders whose attention is fragmented across too many priorities to give proper attention to any of them.
“Every idea we have ever said no to is still a good idea for someone. That is not the question. The question is whether it is the right idea for us, at this time, with these resources.”
— Chief Executive, global professional services firm
What the best strategists do differently
The executives we have observed exercising this discipline most effectively share a common practice: they maintain an explicit list of things they have decided not to do, and they return to it regularly. Not a backlog or a parking lot. A permanent no.
One chief executive we interviewed described reviewing this list in every quarterly planning session — not to reconsider the items on it, but to remind the leadership team of the decisions that had been made and to prevent the organisational tendency to reopen closed questions under the guise of new information.
The three questions
Across our conversations with strategists and operators, a set of three questions emerged consistently as the basis for sound subtraction decisions.
First: if we were starting this today, with full knowledge of what we know now, would we choose to do it? This removes the sunk cost illusion and tests the decision on its current merits. Second: what is this costing us that is not visible on the income statement? The true cost of any activity includes the attention it consumes, the complexity it adds, and the opportunity cost of the things not being done because this thing exists. Third: who inside the organisation benefits from this continuing? Every activity accumulates internal stakeholders. Understanding which stakeholders have a genuine interest in the organisation’s success versus the activity’s continuation is essential.
The courage required
Subtraction decisions are almost always harder to make than addition decisions, for a straightforward reason: addition has obvious visible beneficiaries, while subtraction has obvious visible losers. This asymmetry means that subtraction requires a degree of deliberateness that addition does not.
The organisations gaining ground fastest in the current environment are not necessarily doing more things than their competitors. In several industries we follow closely, the opposite is true. The leaders of these organisations have made explicit decisions about what they are not — and those decisions have liberated resources being concentrated on a smaller number of things with considerably higher returns. Subtraction is not a sign of weakness. In a complex, noisy, resource-constrained environment, it may be the most rigorous form of strategic thinking available.
MORE INSIGHTS
LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
INNOVATION
FINANCE
GLOBAL BUSINESS
CULTURE & PEOPLE
THE VICTORY MAGAZINE
Your story belongs on a global stage.
500+ leaders across 60 countries have already been featured. Applications for the next edition are now open.
THE VICTORY MAGAZINE EST, 2018
Your leadership story belongs
on a global stage.
More from Insights